RURAL LIFE 2.0

Informationen

in "IASDR 07 (International Association of Societies of design Research): Emerging Trends in Design Research",
2007
Autoren
Lola Meyer, Boris Bandyopadhyay, Mitja Windisch, Martina Grotensohn
Herausgeber
Hongkong Polytechnic University, Hongkong

The focus of "Rural Life 2.0" is the research and development of future rural infrastructure especially in Germany. "Rural Life 2.0" states that due to the changing rural demographics new infrastructure solutions have to be designed. The title "Rural Life 2.0" refers to the new participative standard of the Web 2.0 culture. Our research approach integrates rural populations into the research and design process in order to analyse the existing situation and to find solutions for the future. Therefore we need cross-disciplinary research perspectives and basic development skills from: Design, Regional Planning, Social Sciences, Architecture and Engineering.

"KoFor" means cooking and researching: a scientific gastronomic barter trade where with the help of cooking events people come together for research.

Definitions and Abbreviations

INFRASTRUCTURE We extend the notion infrastructure to a supply network which extends from roads, schools, health care and culture to the network of social relations and reminiscence.

KOFOR "Ko" stands for the German word for Cooking: Kochen, "For" stands for the German word for Research: Forschung. Together "KoFor" can be understood as a combination of cooking and researching: cooking for research.

KOFOR-MOBILE The "KoFor-Mobile" is the mobile research station which we designed to undertake systematic research tours to analyse rural living conditions and infrastructures.

MOBILE INFRASTRUCTURE UNIT (MIU) The KoFor-Mobile is a design proposition for one possible Mobile Infrastructure Unit (MIU). We think of other MIUs offering services for health care, education or media entertainment etc.

Research Approach

Our research approach is based on the concept of "project-grounded research" (Findeli 2004). It applies participative design elements to enhance bottom up planning instead of top down instructions. It focusses on the perspectives of the inhabitants of rural areas by bringing them into communication with each other and the researchers. It is divided into two parts:

A) The first one analyses the change of rural infrastructure.

B) The second part develops new infrastructure concepts by realising a design intervention: The KoFor-Mobile as a tangible design thesis for a Mobile Infrastructure Unit.

A)

There is a lack of research approaches to analyse the impact shrinking processes in rural regions on the conditions of daily life. Philipp Oswalt a German architect and urban researcher states that new concepts must be developed to address the shrinking process:

"Deutlich ist, dass die bisherigen Handlungsstrategien hierzu keine befriedigende Antwort formulieren konnten, auch wenn man akzeptiert, dass eine Umkehrung der Schrumpfung vielerorts vorläufig jenseits des Möglichen liegt." (Oswalt 2006 b).

"It is clear that the present strategies don't give a satisfactory answer (Oswalt refers to the shrinking process. Comment of the paper authors) even if we accept that in many places a reversion of the shrinking is beyond the possible." (Translation by the paper authors).

What does conditions of daily life mean? We will investigate the situation of shopping, health care, schools, cultural events and social relations in order to outline the change process between 1982-2007.

Investigating the history of e.g. shopping in one specific village will be done by research in public authority archives, surveys and interviews. To get the relevant data to document the change, we use social science methods: content analysis, observation, survey and experiment. To analyse the process we use the design method of mapping: For e.g. we will develop a map which points out the change of places for personal reminiscence: Friends and neighbours to whom one talked years ago moved away and together with them parts of the personal reminiscence, stories and experiences disappeared. A mapping shows the places of reminiscence which was concentrated in the village but is now spread over different distant places where the people connected to it moved to. Another mapping (Fig. 1). reveals the change of the personal communication network in a rural area over a time period of one generation, 20 years (Fig.2, Fig. 3).

B)

The KoFor-Mobile (Fig. 6) is a materialized design thesis and not a design solution. The design concept of Mobile Infrastructure Units (Fig. 4) is an intervention. We use the KoFor-Mobile to enhance communication between residents and as a crystallization point of ideas, arguments and perspectives for future Mobile Infrastructure Units. We think of Mobile Infrastructure Units for: shopping, health care, social services, communication and media, cultural events etc. Those Service-Units are the framework for the questions:

1. What are the actual and future infrastructural needs of the people?

2. What kind of services and infrastructure matches their needs?

 

1.0 Assumption concerning the rural infrastructure:

1.1 The rural population of the next two generations until the year 2050 will change dramatically in terms of quantity and classification. People who depend on public infrastructure like schools and healthcare etc. will have to leave rural regions (Fig. 5).

1.2 The infrastructure of today can not be provided anymore because for a shrinking rural population schools, hospitals and cultural facilities will not be affordable anylonger.

1.3 We have to develop new infrastructure concepts which match those needs. Design research does not start from the scratch. We might adapt collaborative planning techniques, like "Participatory Action Research" (Selener 1997). A Design approach with participative elements is needed because the traditional cybernetic-planning model that treats people like electric flows is not successful anymore.

 

2.0 Research and development hypothesis:

We think with David Hamilton that qualitative research methods are crucial for our project-grounded research: "Qualitative research methods are key to understanding the issues surrounding design (...)." (Hamilton 1994)

2.1 The ongoing metropolitan research approach to shrinking cities and new planning concepts cannot be transferred one-to-one to shrinking rural regions because the consequences of shrinking cities are less infrastructure whereas in a rural region the consequence is no infrastructure.

2.2 The change of rural infrastructure is a complex phenomenon which has consequences ranging from remote shopping facilities over more distant schools to vanished social communication opportunities.

2.3 The KoFor-Mobil encourages communication between the residents. In villages where the traditional communication spots like backery, bar and barber are gone, the KoFor-Mobil even initiates new social communication.

2.4 Due to more dynamic infrastructure solutions parts of them will be designed and produced for a constantly changing infrastructure market.

 

3.0 Research step

3.1 CONTENT ANALYSIS The first step is to analyse the statistical data about the shrinking process and the demografic change in Germany in order to pre-elect the research regions. Due to the statistical data we will for instance choose the following regions: southern Saarland, western Schleswig-Holstein and southern Uckermark. Two regions are situated in the former West-Germany one is in the former East-Germany. Therefore we underline the fact that shrinking is not a specific phenomenon in former East-German regions but in regions of historic economic growth in West-Germany too. The next step is to work out the research tour, contact the local mayors and institutions as to announce our research-visit.

3.2 COOKING FOR RESEARCH: KOFOR We offer a gastronomic event (e.g. an specific south german meal in an east german village or an indian dish in the same place) which decreases the communication barriers between researchers and residents. We hope to bring together residents who haven`t talked to each other for a long time, so that their KoFor experience is not only having a good and cheap meal but also the social communication with other residents. During the gastronomical event (Fig. 6) the research team conducts surveys and observations.

Based on the research results we define which services are crucial for example for the health care unit and which ones might be optional. We also list the corresponding needs of the interviewed rural residents in order to specify which kind of health care is needed. Different needs will foster optional solutions. For example in one region a child doctor is more frequently needed than a general practitioner. Or in oneregion a mobile workshop for cars is necessary while in another a house repairing workshop is requested.

 

4.0 Research objectives

The KoFor-Mobile is the starting point for a systematic discourse about the concept of Mobile Infrastructure Units (Fig. 4,6).

Our objective is to initialise a communication and development process between people living in shrinking regions, communication-, industrial- and servicedesigners, rural-planning professionals, architects and engineers in order to realise a mobile infrastructure corresponding to the need analysis developed in research. Secondary we understand the start of interdisciplinary communication between the professionals as a communication design job. Based on the research data, the new concept of “Mobilised Infrastrucure“ should be developed, exhibited and discussed for future infrastructure development strategies.

References

Burckhardt (1980), Wer plant die Planung? – Architektur, Politik und Mensch, Jesko Fezer u. Martin Schmitz (Ed.), Kassel, Germany, Martin Schmitz.

Cross (2006), Designerly Ways of Knowing, London, Great Britain, Springer.

ESPON Atlas – Mapping the structure of the Europaen territory, European Spatial Planing Observation Network (ESPON), Bonn, Germany, Bundesamt für Bauwesen 2006.

Findeli (2004), Die projektgeleitete Forschung (project-grounded research), Eine Methode der Designforschung, In: Erstes Design Forschungssymposium, Swiss Design Network, Basel, Switzerland, May 13-14, p. 40-42. www.swiss- design.org.

Frayling (1993/4), Research in Art and Design, In: Royal College of Art Research Paper #1, London, Great Britain.

Friedman (2002), Theory Construction in Design Research. Criteria, Approaches, and Methods, In: Common Ground DRS International Conference, Brunel University, 5-7 Sept., London, Great Britain.

Hamilton (1994), Traditions, Preferences and Postures, In: Applied Qualitative Research in Handbook of Qualitatve Research, N. Denzin, Y. Lincoln (Ed.), S. 63.

Höger and Stutterheim (2005), (Ed.), Querfeldein 1 – Design & Politik“. Texte zur gesellschaftlichen Relevanz gestalterischen Schaffens. Würzburg, Germany, Fh Würzburg-Schweinfurt, Fb Gestaltung.

Jonas (2003), Mind the gap! – on knowing and not-knowing in design, Barcelona, Spain, Proceedings of EAD.

Kemp (2006), Knowledge can be generated, and questions answered, through analytic scholarship, iterative experiments and innovative examples of artefact and designs, Royal College of Art, London, Great Britain, www. rca.ac.uk/research, research-handbook. (16.06.2006).

Kil (2004), Luxus der Leere – Vom schwierigen Rückzug aus der Wachstumswelt, Wuppertal, Germany, Müller u. Bussmann.

NGbK (2003), (Ed.), Learning from – Städte von Welt, Phantasmen der Zivilgesellschaft, informelle Organisation, edition metroZones 2, Berlin, Germany, Neue Gesellschaft für bildende Kunst.

Nelson, Stolterman (2003), The Design Way. Intentional change in an unpredictable world. New Jersey, USA, Englewood Cliffs, Educational Technology Publications.

Oswalt (2005), (Ed.), Schrumpfende Städte. Band1, Internationale Untersuchung, Ostfildern, Germany, Hatje Cantz.

Oswalt and Rieniets (2006a), (Ed.), Atlas of Shrinking Cities, Unter redaktioneller Mitarbeit von Elke Beyer, Anke Hagemann, Kristina Herresthal und Henning Schirmel, Ostfildern, Germany, Hatje Cantz.

Oswalt (2006b), (Ed.), Schrumpfende Städte. Band 2, Handlungskonzepte, Ostfildern, Germany, Hatje Cantz. Selener (1997), Participatory Action Research and Social Change, 2nd ed., Cornell University Press, New York, USA.

 

© 2001 - 2013 urbikon.com   |   Impressum   |   Letzte Änderung dieser Seite: 27.02.2010 | 09:56